[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46A10882.10009@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:09:54 -0400
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>,
"clameter@....com" <clameter@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] CONFIG_STABLE: Define it
On 07/20/2007 12:36 PM, Stefan Richter wrote:
>>>> +config STABLE
>>>> + bool "Stable kernel"
>
> PS: Imagine the headlines at Slashdot, CNET et al when this gets in.
I think this really should be called CONFIG_EXTRA_CHECKS.
It's a lot clearer what that means...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists