[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46A4CCF5.4040402@tmr.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:44:53 -0400
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@...world.com>
CC: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel M/L <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] what should 'uptime' be on suspend?
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 09:54:37AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
>> So is setting it to a random number considered correct behavior? Any of
>> the first three values I mentioned would make sense, but the value I see
>> is neither time since resume, time since power-on to do the resume, or
>> any of the logical uptime values. That was the whole point of the
>> original post, the uptime reported makes no sense at all.
>>
>>
> I assumed you had booted for a short time, suspended, resumed, and
> then noticed the uptime was longer than time since resume.
>
> If you think there is a bug it might help to do a cold boot, at
> some point note uptime and then immediately suspend, resume some time
> later, immediately note uptime (including local time), keep it
> running, and later monitor uptime against local time (i.e. the local
> time will let you know the change you expect to see in uptime). You
> might also want to confirm that the local time is maintained
> correctly.
>
I resumed this morning, uptime before the suspend was ~4 hours, suspend
time was ~30 hours, resume took 76 sec from power-on, uptime was 2m56s.
As originally noted, the first time I did this the "uptime" after resume
was 6+min. First noted on suspend to ram, this was suspend to disk to
see if that changed anything.
Just an oddity, I guess if I care I can track it myself.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@....com>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists