[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070724115100.B7A9B1BF959@siro.lan>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:51:00 +0900 (JST)
From: yamamoto@...inux.co.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, menage@...gle.com, haveblue@...ibm.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, xemul@...nvz.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][-mm PATCH 6/8] Memory controller add per container LRU and
reclaim (v3)
hi,
> +unsigned long mem_container_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> + struct list_head *dst,
> + unsigned long *scanned, int order,
> + int mode, struct zone *z,
> + struct mem_container *mem_cont,
> + int active)
> +{
> + unsigned long nr_taken = 0;
> + struct page *page;
> + unsigned long scan;
> + LIST_HEAD(mp_list);
> + struct list_head *src;
> + struct meta_page *mp;
> +
> + if (active)
> + src = &mem_cont->active_list;
> + else
> + src = &mem_cont->inactive_list;
> +
> + for (scan = 0; scan < nr_to_scan && !list_empty(src); scan++) {
> + mp = list_entry(src->prev, struct meta_page, lru);
> + page = mp->page;
> +
- is it safe to pick the lists without mem_cont->lru_lock held?
- what prevents mem_container_uncharge from freeing this meta_page
behind us?
YAMAMOTO Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists