[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070725191257.GA2311@mellanox.co.il>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:12:57 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@....mellanox.co.il>
To: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@....mellanox.co.il>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
general@...ts.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH trivial] include linux/mutex.h from scsi_transport_iscsi.h
> Quoting Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH trivial] include linux/mutex.h from scsi_transport_iscsi.h
>
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.h uses struct mutex, so while
> >linux/mutex.h seems to be pulled in indirectly
> >by one of the headers it includes, the right thing
> >is to include linux/mutex.h directly.
> >
>
> Is that part about always including the header directly right?
Think so. Analogous patches by me has been accepted in various
subsystems. See e.g. f8916c11a4dc4cb2367e9bee1788f4e0f1b4eabc.
> If so
> then were you going to include list.h too,
Makes sense. I'll repost.
> and were you going to fix up
> some of the other iscsi code?
Not at the moment.
The reason I noticed this is because I'm doing some other project.
I'll post patches for other files if/when I notice any issues.
--
MST
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists