[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1185547278.13228.15.camel@violet>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:41:18 +0200
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] fix endianness bug in l2cap_sock_listen()
Hi Al,
> We loop through psm values, calling __l2cap_get_sock_by_addr(psm, ...)
> until we get NULL; then we set ->psm of our socket to htobs(psm).
> IOW, we find unused psm value and put it into our socket. So far, so
> good, but... __l2cap_get_sock_by_addr() compares its argument with
> ->psm of sockets. IOW, the entire thing works correctly only on
> little-endian. On big-endian we'll get "no socket with such psm"
> on the first iteration, since we won't find a socket with ->psm == 0x1001.
> We will happily conclude that 0x1001 is unused and slap htobs(0x1001)
> (i.e. 0x110) into ->psm of our socket. Of course, the next time around
> the same thing will repeat and we'll just get a fsckload of sockets
> with the same ->psm assigned.
>
> Fix: pass htobs(psm) to __l2cap_get_sock_by_addr() there. All other
> callers are already passing little-endian values and all places that
> store something in ->psm are storing little-endian.
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Dave, all four patches are good and should go in sooner than later. If
you want me to put them into my tree first, then I can do that or you
can apply them directly. You choice.
Regards
Marcel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists