linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] fix endianness bug in l2cap_sock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070729.001600.74751290.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 29 Jul 2007 00:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	marcel@...tmann.org
Cc:	viro@....linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] fix endianness bug in l2cap_sock_listen()

From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:41:18 +0200

> > We loop through psm values, calling __l2cap_get_sock_by_addr(psm, ...)
> > until we get NULL; then we set ->psm of our socket to htobs(psm).
> > IOW, we find unused psm value and put it into our socket.  So far, so
> > good, but...  __l2cap_get_sock_by_addr() compares its argument with
> > ->psm of sockets.  IOW, the entire thing works correctly only on
> > little-endian.  On big-endian we'll get "no socket with such psm"
> > on the first iteration, since we won't find a socket with ->psm == 0x1001.
> > We will happily conclude that 0x1001 is unused and slap htobs(0x1001)
> > (i.e. 0x110) into ->psm of our socket.  Of course, the next time around
> > the same thing will repeat and we'll just get a fsckload of sockets
> > with the same ->psm assigned.
> > 
> > Fix: pass htobs(psm) to __l2cap_get_sock_by_addr() there.  All other
> > callers are already passing little-endian values and all places that
> > store something in ->psm are storing little-endian.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>

Applied.

> Dave, all four patches are good and should go in sooner than later. If
> you want me to put them into my tree first, then I can do that or you
> can apply them directly. You choice.

I'll take care of these, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/