[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1185504973.6609.25.camel@perkele>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:56:13 -0400
From: Eric St-Laurent <ericstl34@...patico.ca>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: make cpu_clock() not use the rq clock
On Thu, 2007-26-07 at 11:00 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Subject: sched: make cpu_clock() not use the rq clock
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>
> it is enough to disable interrupts to get the precise rq-clock
> of the local CPU.
Hi Ingo,
Those new fast nanoseconds resolution clock APIs are nice but it seems
to me that their naming and _where_ they are implemented in the tree is
a little odd, IMO.
We have:
1. sched_clock() is in kernel/sched.c (weak implementation)
2. sched_clock() is in arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c (architecture override)
3. rq_clock() is in kernel/sched.c
4. cpu_clock() is in kernel/sched.c
I would suggest:
1. rename sched_clock() (remove sched_ as it's not sched specific
anymore) and place it in kernel/time/...
2. rename the architecture specific version of it too
This first function is the basic fast ns clock
3. base your rq_clock() on cpu_clock() (#4) or use the later directly.
This is local to sched.c
4. move cpu_clock() in kernel/time/...
This the per-cpu monotonic version.
See my point? Base the scheduler clock from a general kernel API, not
the other way around.
Just a suggestion.
Best regards,
- Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists