linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ia64: fix a few section mismatch warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070727042744.GA10144@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:27:44 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64: fix a few section mismatch warnings

On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 02:18:13AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:01:41PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>   
> > +static void *__init_refok alloc_rte(unsigned long size)
> > +{
> > +	return alloc_bootmem(size);
> > +}
> 
> That makes no sense at all.  If we ever call that after freeing initmem,
> we are screwed, period.  Sounds like __init fodder.

The call site has logic to prevent this from being called after init.
And the call site cannot be made __init and to limit the scope of
the __init_refok a small function is used.

So unless I mis-understood something the above should be OK.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/