linux-kernel - Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070730190822.GB28554@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:08:22 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	david@...g.hm
Cc:	John <darknessenvelops@...il.com>,
	Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>, ck@....kolivas.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)


* david@...g.hm <david@...g.hm> wrote:

> > ah, you mean Kasper Sandberg's report? That turned out to be based 
> > on an older CFS version, not v2.6.23-rc1. Kasper said he'll redo his 
> > tests, and if there's still any regression left we'll fix it.
> 
> probably. I delete lkml messages pretty agressivly so I don't have 
> them around to refer to.

lkml.org is your friend:

 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/27/423
 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/28/50
 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/30/195

:-)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/