linux-kernel - Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070730191029.GA29327@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:10:29 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Kenneth Prugh <ken69267@...il.com>
Cc:	John <darknessenvelops@...il.com>, ck@....kolivas.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)


* Kenneth Prugh <ken69267@...il.com> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > <large snip>
> 
> Hello, I have a gaming rig and would love to help benchmark with my 
> copy of UT2004(E6600 Core2 and a 7950GTO card). Or if you have 
> anything else that would better serve as a benchmark I could grab it 
> and try.
> 
> The only problem is I don't know what 2 kernels I should be using to 
> test the schedulers. I assume 2.6.23-rc1 for CFS, but what about SD?

.22-ck1 includes it, so that should be fine:

 http://ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0707.1/0318.html

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/