| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:11:06 -0500 From: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5 On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 10:29 -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: > Overall JFS seems the fastest but reviewing the mailing list for JFS it > seems like there a lot of problems, especially when people who use JFS > 1 > year, their speed goes to 5 MiB/s over time and the defragfs tool has been > removed(?) from the source/Makefile and on Google it says not to use it > due to corruption. The defragfs tool was an unported holdover from OS/2, which is why it was removed. There never was a working Linux version. I have some ideas to improve jfs allocation to avoid fragmentation problems, but jfs isn't my full-time job anymore, so I can't promise anything. I'm not sure about the corruption claims. I'd like to hear some specifics on that. Anyway, for enterprise use, I couldn't recommend jfs, since there is no full-time maintainer. Thanks, Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists