linux-kernel - Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707301712030.7153@p34.internal.lan>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:12:17 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
cc:	a1426z@...ab.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on
 software raid 5



On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Miklos Szeredi wrote:

>> Extrapolating these %cpu number makes ZFS the fastest.
>>
>> Are you sure these numbers are correct?
>
> Note, that %cpu numbers for fuse filesystems are inherently skewed,
> because the CPU usage of the filesystem process itself is not taken
> into account.
>
> So the numbers are not all that good, but according to the zfs-fuse
> author it hasn't been optimized yet, so they may improve.
>
> Miklos
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

This was performed on an E6300, 1 core was ZFS/FUSE (or quite a bit of it 
anyway)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/