[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070730211826.GA22419@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:18:26 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
david@...g.hm, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] let SUSPEND select HOTPLUG_CPU
Hi!
> > Wait, doesn't HOTPLUG_CPU also depend on EXPERIMENTAL?
>
> Damn, I started thinking about it, and then forgot about it when
> finishing the patch.
>
> My thoughts were:
> Is HOTPLUG_CPU still an experimental feature, or has it become a
> well-tested no longer experimental feature now that it's used on
> most recent laptops?
It is complex :-(.
HOTPLUG_CPU is pretty solid for the case how _suspend_ uses it (ie
drivers quiescent).
It is also known broken for _other_ uses. (There was flamewar about
that recently).
I'm not sure how to express that in Kconfig language without
uglyness... We probably could split HOTPLUG_CPU into
HOTPLUG_CPU_SUSPEND_ONLY (not experimental) and HOTPLUG_CPU (enables
/sysfs interface)... but I do not think that is good idea. (It would
also make suspend debugging a bit harder).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists