[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070730045804.GA7124@in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:28:04 +0530
From: ankita@...ibm.com (Ankita Garg)
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt 6/9] spinlock/rt_lock random cleanups
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 07:45:40PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
>
> ---
> include/linux/rt_lock.h | 6 ++++--
> include/linux/spinlock.h | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.22/include/linux/rt_lock.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.22.orig/include/linux/rt_lock.h
> +++ linux-2.6.22/include/linux/rt_lock.h
> @@ -128,12 +128,14 @@ struct semaphore name = \
> */
> #define DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED COMPAT_DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED
>
> -extern void fastcall __sema_init(struct semaphore *sem, int val, char *name, char *file, int line);
> +extern void fastcall
> +__sema_init(struct semaphore *sem, int val, char *name, char *file, int line);
>
> #define rt_sema_init(sem, val) \
> __sema_init(sem, val, #sem, __FILE__, __LINE__)
>
> -extern void fastcall __init_MUTEX(struct semaphore *sem, char *name, char *file, int line);
> +extern void fastcall
> +__init_MUTEX(struct semaphore *sem, char *name, char *file, int line);
> #define rt_init_MUTEX(sem) \
> __init_MUTEX(sem, #sem, __FILE__, __LINE__)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.22/include/linux/spinlock.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.22.orig/include/linux/spinlock.h
> +++ linux-2.6.22/include/linux/spinlock.h
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ extern int __lockfunc generic__raw_read_
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
> extern __lockfunc void _raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock);
> -#define _raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) _raw_spin_lock(lock)
> +# define _raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) _raw_spin_lock(lock)
Any reason behind including a space here?
> extern __lockfunc int _raw_spin_trylock(raw_spinlock_t *lock);
> extern __lockfunc void _raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock);
> extern __lockfunc void _raw_read_lock(raw_rwlock_t *lock);
> @@ -325,7 +325,8 @@ do { \
>
> # define _read_trylock(rwl) rt_read_trylock(rwl)
> # define _write_trylock(rwl) rt_write_trylock(rwl)
> -#define _write_trylock_irqsave(rwl, flags) rt_write_trylock_irqsave(rwl, flags)
> +# define _write_trylock_irqsave(rwl, flags) \
> + rt_write_trylock_irqsave(rwl, flags)
>
> # define _read_lock(rwl) rt_read_lock(rwl)
> # define _write_lock(rwl) rt_write_lock(rwl)
>
--
Regards,
Ankita Garg (ankita@...ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM India Systems & Technology Labs,
Bangalore, India
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists