[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070730054004.GI3432@traven>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:40:04 +0200
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias.kaehlcke@...il.com>
To: Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>
Cc: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>, linville@...driver.com,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Use mutex instead of semaphore in the Host AP driver
El Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 09:17:25AM +0530 Satyam Sharma ha dit:
> Whoops ...
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> >
> > > On Sunday 29 July 2007 23:34, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > > > The Host AP driver uses a semaphore as mutex. Use the mutex API
> > > > instead of the (binary) semaphore.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias.kaehlcke@...il.com>
> >
> > [ Something seems to have gone wrong with your diff / patch / script.
> > There was no diff header here, which should have been. ]
> >
> > > > - res = down_interruptible(&local->rid_bap_sem);
> > > > + res = mutex_lock_interruptible(&local->rid_bap_mtx);
> > > > if (res)
> > > > return res;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -902,7 +902,7 @@ static int hfa384x_set_rid(struct net_device *dev, u16 rid, void *buf, int len)
> > > > /* RID len in words and +1 for rec.rid */
> > > > rec.len = cpu_to_le16(len / 2 + len % 2 + 1);
> > > >
> > > > - res = down_interruptible(&local->rid_bap_sem);
> > > > + res = mutex_lock_interruptible(&local->rid_bap_mtx);
> > > > if (res)
> > > > return res;
> > > >
> > >
> > > Is res returned to userspace? If yes, that's not right.
> >
> > Yup, that's not right.
> >
> > > On a interrupted mutex allocation you should return
> > > -ERESTARTSYS to userspace.
> >
> > Nope, userspace must not see ERESTARTSYS (I /think/ this is the third
> > time I'm participating in this exact same discussion :-)
> >
> > If the return would be caught by a previous in-kernel caller in the
> > call chain, ERESTARTSYS is okay and it could try to restart the
> > operation. However, if the return goes unfiltered directly to
> > userspace, EINTR is the correct choice.
>
> Eek, and because mutex_lock_interruptible() *does* return -EINTR when
> interrupted by a signal, and I noticed that hfa384x_set_rid() could be
> called from an ioctl(2) codepath with no intermediate caller trying to
> restart it, so the code is perfectly alright, actually.
>
> But the patch doesn't have the diff header anyway, so Matthias would
> probably have to resend in any case :-)
thanks for reviewing the patch and for your comments, here is the
patch with the diff header (no idea what when wrong with the other
one)
regards
matthias
--
The Host AP driver uses a semaphore as mutex. Use the mutex API
instead of the (binary) semaphore.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias.kaehlcke@...il.com>
--
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_hw.c
index 959887b..d3dacbc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_hw.c
@@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ static int hfa384x_get_rid(struct net_device *dev, u16 rid, void *buf, int len,
local->hw_downloading)
return -ENODEV;
- res = down_interruptible(&local->rid_bap_sem);
+ res = mutex_lock_interruptible(&local->rid_bap_mtx);
if (res)
return res;
@@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ static int hfa384x_get_rid(struct net_device *dev, u16 rid, void *buf, int len,
printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: hfa384x_get_rid: CMDCODE_ACCESS failed "
"(res=%d, rid=%04x, len=%d)\n",
dev->name, res, rid, len);
- up(&local->rid_bap_sem);
+ mutex_unlock(&local->rid_bap_mtx);
return res;
}
@@ -861,7 +861,7 @@ static int hfa384x_get_rid(struct net_device *dev, u16 rid, void *buf, int len,
res = hfa384x_from_bap(dev, BAP0, buf, len);
spin_unlock_bh(&local->baplock);
- up(&local->rid_bap_sem);
+ mutex_unlock(&local->rid_bap_mtx);
if (res) {
if (res != -ENODATA)
@@ -902,7 +902,7 @@ static int hfa384x_set_rid(struct net_device *dev, u16 rid, void *buf, int len)
/* RID len in words and +1 for rec.rid */
rec.len = cpu_to_le16(len / 2 + len % 2 + 1);
- res = down_interruptible(&local->rid_bap_sem);
+ res = mutex_lock_interruptible(&local->rid_bap_mtx);
if (res)
return res;
@@ -917,12 +917,12 @@ static int hfa384x_set_rid(struct net_device *dev, u16 rid, void *buf, int len)
if (res) {
printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: hfa384x_set_rid (rid=%04x, len=%d) - "
"failed - res=%d\n", dev->name, rid, len, res);
- up(&local->rid_bap_sem);
+ mutex_unlock(&local->rid_bap_mtx);
return res;
}
res = hfa384x_cmd(dev, HFA384X_CMDCODE_ACCESS_WRITE, rid, NULL, NULL);
- up(&local->rid_bap_sem);
+ mutex_unlock(&local->rid_bap_mtx);
if (res) {
printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: hfa384x_set_rid: CMDCODE_ACCESS_WRITE "
@@ -3171,7 +3171,7 @@ prism2_init_local_data(struct prism2_helper_functions *funcs, int card_idx,
spin_lock_init(&local->cmdlock);
spin_lock_init(&local->baplock);
spin_lock_init(&local->lock);
- init_MUTEX(&local->rid_bap_sem);
+ mutex_init(&local->rid_bap_mtx);
if (card_idx < 0 || card_idx >= MAX_PARM_DEVICES)
card_idx = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_wlan.h b/drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_wlan.h
index 87a54aa..a42325c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_wlan.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_wlan.h
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#include <linux/wireless.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <net/iw_handler.h>
#include "hostap_config.h"
@@ -641,7 +642,7 @@ struct local_info {
* when removing entries from the list.
* TX and RX paths can use read lock. */
spinlock_t cmdlock, baplock, lock;
- struct semaphore rid_bap_sem;
+ struct mutex rid_bap_mtx;
u16 infofid; /* MAC buffer id for info frame */
/* txfid, intransmitfid, next_txtid, and next_alloc are protected by
* txfidlock */
--
Matthias Kaehlcke
Linux Application Developer
Barcelona
You must have a plan. If you don't have a plan,
you'll become part of somebody else's plan
.''`.
using free software / Debian GNU/Linux | http://debian.org : :' :
`. `'`
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 47D8E5D4 `-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists