[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707311824420.26032@enigma.security.iitk.ac.in>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:25:45 +0530 (IST)
From: Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cornelia.huck@...ibm.com,
stern@...land.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] sysfs: make sysfs_addrm_finish() return void
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
> With the previous sysfs_add_one() update, there is only one user of
> the return value of sysfs_addrm_finish() and the user can switch to
> testing @sd easily. Make sysfs_addrm_finish() return void for cleaner
> semantics as suggested by Satyam Sharma.
>
> This patch doesn't introduce any noticeable behavior change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
> Cc: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists