linux-kernel - Re: LinuxPPS & spinlocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070731194457.GB9840@enneenne.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:44:57 +0200
From:	Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>
To:	Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>
Cc:	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: LinuxPPS & spinlocks

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 12:19:48AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:

> That's just absolute bullshit.

...

> I'm sorry to say this, Rodolfo, but _all_ your arguments above are
> *totally* nonsensical and factually incorrect -- and I have had enough of
> trying to talk sense to you, it's been ~15 mails in this thread already,
> and I've been WASTING my time trying to teach / explain to you, but it's
> just *shocking* that you prefer to stick to a wholly incorrect (which I
> suspect you've already understood by now anyway) position rather than
> just accepting that the present patch is wrong and go about correcting
> it instead.
> [snip]

Sorry for wasting your time. :'( Maybe you can provide your solution
for PPS support and get it included into kernel tree so we can use it
and live happy!  :)

Several people (Andrew, David, et all) wrote to me a lot of letters
without loosing their patience. I'm a poor programmer, not a «guru»
like you, and I need more time to understand things. I'm trying to do
my best. :)

However I'm very proud to be a "poor programmer" (slow in
understanding things) but a gentleman rather than a "kernel-guru" like
you but totally ill-mannered.

Thanks anyway for your (precious) time,

Rodolfo

P.S. A gentle programmer just wrote to me a letter where, proposing
code/patches, showed to me possible good solutions, so I think I'm
going to modify again the locking code soon.

-- 

GNU/Linux Solutions                  e-mail:    giometti@...eenne.com
Linux Device Driver                             giometti@...dd.com
Embedded Systems                     		giometti@...ux.it
UNIX programming                     phone:     +39 349 2432127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/