| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0708010217000.28746@enigma.security.iitk.ac.in> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:45:39 +0530 (IST) From: Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org> To: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com> cc: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: LinuxPPS & spinlocks Hi, On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Rodolfo Giometti wrote: > Sorry for wasting your time. :'( Maybe you can provide your solution > for PPS support and get it included into kernel tree so we can use it > and live happy! :) Please stop embarrassing me (and yourself). Sorry, I did lose my patience (others you mention did not) but then that's precisely because of my own _less_ experience, if anything. No, it's not like I "want to provide my solution for PPS support and get it included into kernel tree" like you wrote above -- I simply identified 4 problem areas in your implementation and wanted them to be addressed. [If you can do so yourself, good enough, otherwise I'm happy to send patch based on your earlier one too -- the modifications I have in mind are few and simple.] I have no personal stake in this PPS stuff anyway, this is just a normal peer review of submissions that should always happen. Thanks, Satyam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists