[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070802114557.GC4067@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:45:57 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@...-job.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ck@....kolivas.org
Subject: Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
* Lee Revell <rlrevell@...-job.com> wrote:
> On 7/31/07, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > Almost all of the Reiser3
> > code runs under the BKL, and the only other major kernel infrastructure
> > that has BKL dependencies is the TTY code.
>
> Also NFS:
>
> $ grep -rIi lock_kernel kernel-source/linux-2.6.17/fs/nfs/ | wc -l
> 94
yeah - but i never saw NFS cause really big BKL latencies. IIRC it uses
the BKL mostly for archaic reasons, most of the NFS code is SMP-safe.
Almost all of the reiser3 code runs under the BKL on the other hand.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists