[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070802121018.GA11900@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:10:18 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ck@....kolivas.org
Subject: Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
* Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk> wrote:
> > ah, indeed, that makes quite a bit of sense. Almost all of the
> > Reiser3 code runs under the BKL, and the only other major kernel
> > infrastructure that has BKL dependencies is the TTY code. Kasper, as
> > a debugging matter, could you try to move that spamassassin workload
> > off into a non-Reiser3 filesystem and/or disable PREEMPT_BKL? If
> > that makes a noticeable difference (for the better ;) then we can
> > continue figuring out what's happening exactly.
>
> the pricess is as this:
> mail client fetches mail
> mail client invokes spamasassin
> if spam -> spam
> else filtering
> if it matches certain filters, it gets put into my imap server, which is
> reiserfs.
do you have any filesystem that is not reiserfs? If yes, could you, as a
test, check whether file activities on _that_ file system still cause
these lags, or is the lag purely connected to the reiser3 filesystem?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists