[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708021536350.24572@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 15:38:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
cc: Herbert Rosmanith <kernel@...dsau.enemy.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: VIA EPIA EK: strange eth dev numbering
On Aug 2 2007 17:07, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Aug 2 2007 12:56, Herbert Rosmanith wrote:
>>>> On Aug 2 2007 12:42, Herbert Rosmanith wrote:
>>>> There never *were* days when eth0 remained eth0 across such changes.
>>> but there *were* days when eth0 was eth0, if the kernel reports it as such.
>>> now there is no eth0 at all. if I see an "eth0" from dmesg, I expect
>>> it to be present.
>>
>> Wait, you forget that something may change the name. That dmesg message
>> from 1 second ago does not need to be valid anymore, just as anything
>> else in this world.
>
>That was my argument - there should be no way to *change* the name, but
>to give an alias(es) - entirely different thing.
Ah, in that case, make the kernel print the PCI-ID instead of the name.
(Or perhaps both together.)
As for userspace, you are free to do whatever you find most useful.
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists