| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 09:39:08 -0400 From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@...-job.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, ck@....kolivas.org Subject: Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1) On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 13:45 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Lee Revell <rlrevell@...-job.com> wrote: > > > On 7/31/07, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote: > > > Almost all of the Reiser3 > > > code runs under the BKL, and the only other major kernel infrastructure > > > that has BKL dependencies is the TTY code. > > > > Also NFS: > > > > $ grep -rIi lock_kernel kernel-source/linux-2.6.17/fs/nfs/ | wc -l > > 94 > > yeah - but i never saw NFS cause really big BKL latencies. IIRC it uses > the BKL mostly for archaic reasons, most of the NFS code is SMP-safe. > Almost all of the reiser3 code runs under the BKL on the other hand. We're still working on fixing the NFS case, but as everyone knows, finding those last few obscure code sections which still depend on BKL protection can be tedious work... Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists