linux-kernel - Re: ck vs. cfs : realtime audio performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070802192625.GA17944@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 2 Aug 2007 21:26:25 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Carlo Florendo <subscribermail@...il.com>
Cc:	Lenar Lõhmus <lenar@...y.ee>,
	Klaus Schulz <Klaus.Schulz@....de>, ck@....kolivas.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>
Subject: Re: ck vs. cfs : realtime audio performance


* Carlo Florendo <subscribermail@...il.com> wrote:

>>>> With CFS I also experienced XRUNS from time to time, what never 
>>>> happened with ck.
> 
> See, this is exactly the problem of the SD ranters.  A ranter posts a 
> problem, doesn't give reproducability hints, and neither provides 
> technical detail, not even the slightest relevant stats.  And the most 
> irritating part is that the code that the OP wrote (or at least its 
> relevant parts) is not even available for download.

actually, there was no "SD ranting" going on at all. Klaus reported a 
problem, Martin forwarded it to me, i replied to it and Klaus gave me 
lots of debug info in a very professional way. So please calm down and 
lets get back to the tech topics, ok? (and i'd like to apologize here to 
Karl and Martin for the rough and unjust treatment they received on 
lkml.)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/