[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1186323986.3858.19.camel@fanta4.site>
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 16:26:26 +0200
From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Cal Peake <cp@...olutedigital.net>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
Frank Hale <frankhale@...il.com>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel ACPI Mailing List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
len.brown@...el.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
tim.gardner@...onical.com
Subject: Re: ACPI on Averatec 2370
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 11:30 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > amd_apic_timer_broken: forcing return value of 1
> What exact type of machine is it?
FYI: There seem to be a very wide range of Turion machines affected by
the latest no_hz/time/clockevents changes.
Tim Gardner reported a hang while booting and also pointed to commit:
e9e2cdb412412326c4827fc78ba27f410d837e6e
In the thread: ACPI Regression on Dell E1501
http://marc.info/?t=118246118400004&r=1&w=2
I am also seeing the hang Tim reported with a Ferrari F5000
(AMD Turion(tm) 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-60)
On this machine, the hang only occurs sporadically (about every third
time). It seems, once it could pass a critical init section all is fine?
Hope that helps in some way...
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists