linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RESEND] Fix a potential NULL pointer deref in the aic7xxx, ahc_print

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9a8748490708050836m20b5dd38gf6a8968cd4b106f9@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:36:35 +0200
From:	"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
To:	"James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com>
Cc:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"James Bottomley" <jejb@...nel.org>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	"Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@...iguy.com>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] Fix a potential NULL pointer deref in the aic7xxx, ahc_print_register() function

On 04/08/07, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 20:30 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > (resend of patch previously submitted on 28-Jul-2007 23:06)
> >
> >
> > Ehlo,
> >
> > The Coverity checker noticed that we have a potential NULL pointer
> > deref in drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_core.c::ahc_print_register().
> > This patch handles it by adding the same test against NULL that is
> > used elsewhere in the same function.
>
> It's on my list of things to look at ... but not very high.  I suspect
> it actually isn't triggerable, but if you can tell me how, it will save
> me from looking.
>

Here's what Coverity reported :
...
6525 	int
6526 	ahc_print_register(ahc_reg_parse_entry_t *table, u_int num_entries,
6527 			   const char *name, u_int address, u_int value,
6528 			   u_int *cur_column, u_int wrap_point)
6529 	{
6530 		int	printed;
6531 		u_int	printed_mask;
6532 	

Event var_compare_op: Added "cur_column" due to comparison "cur_column != 0"
Also see events: [var_deref_op]
At conditional (1): "cur_column != 0" taking false path

6533 		if (cur_column != NULL && *cur_column >= wrap_point) {
6534 			printf("\n");
6535 			*cur_column = 0;
6536 		}
6537 		printed = printf("%s[0x%x]", name, value);

At conditional (2): "table == 0" taking true path

6538 		if (table == NULL) {
6539 			printed += printf(" ");

Event var_deref_op: Variable "cur_column" tracked as NULL was dereferenced.
Also see events: [var_compare_op]

6540 			*cur_column += printed;
6541 			return (printed);
6542 		}
...

So it requires a NULL 'table' and a != NULL 'cur_column' to trigger.
Whether or not that's actually possible I'm not sure, but it seems
safer to guard against it :)


By the way; if this can actually be triggered, then
ahd_print_register() has the same problem.


-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/