[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440708050939t7853ad74w5f039d1478964857@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 09:39:43 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Muli Ben-Yehuda" <muli@...ibm.com>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, riku.seppala@...p.net,
"Andy Whitcroft" <apw@...dowen.org>,
"Chuck Ebbert" <cebbert@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFT] finish i386 and x86-64 sysdata conversion
On 8/5/07, Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 01:49:57AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> > Can you change
> > pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata(int busno)
> > to
> > pci_scan_bus_on_node(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, int node)?
>
> Do you anticipate passing in a different pci_ops or node?
> In any case please remember I am aiming for the minimal "obviously
> correc" change for 2.6.23...
>
> > pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata(int busno) make me feel that i need feed one
> > sysdata as on param for it.
>
> Yeah, lousy name, but the best I came up with. Runner up was
> 'x86_pci_scan_bus', which is I think worse?
>
or
pci_scan_bus_on_node(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, int node)
x86_pci_scan_root_bus(int bus)
{
pci_scan_bus_on_node(bus, &pci_root_ops, -1);
}
i need node as one param for my patch later in irq.c and legacy.c
YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists