linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFT] finish i386 and x86-64 sysdata conversion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:54:57 +0300
From:	Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	riku.seppala@...p.net, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFT] finish i386 and x86-64 sysdata conversion

On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 01:49:57AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:

> Can you change
> pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata(int busno)
> to
> pci_scan_bus_on_node(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, int node)?

Do you anticipate passing in a different pci_ops or node? 
In any case please remember I am aiming for the minimal "obviously
correc" change for 2.6.23...

> pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata(int busno) make me feel that i need feed one
> sysdata as on param for it.

Yeah, lousy name, but the best I came up with. Runner up was
'x86_pci_scan_bus', which is I think worse?

Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/