linux-kernel - Re: about modularization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46B78978.7000507@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:50:00 +0200
From:	Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To:	Mitchell Erblich <erblichs@...thlink.net>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"T. J. Brumfield" <enderandrew@...il.com>
Subject: Re: about modularization

On 08/06/2007 10:20 PM, Mitchell Erblich wrote:

>     Thus, a hybrid schedular approach could be taken
>     that would default to a single uni-processor schedular

What a brilliant idea in a world where buying a non multi core CPU is 
getting to be only somewhat easier than a non SMT one...

Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/