[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200708071458.45687.lenb@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:58:45 -0400
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: trenn@...e.de, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@...nline.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mjg59@...f.ucam.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.22 regression: thermal trip points
On Monday 06 August 2007 05:55, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > For the
> > upstream kernel, I think it is more appropriate to expose and fix
> > the fundamental problems. For distro kernels, I'm less concerned
> > if you hide bugs instead of fixing them.
>
> This is okay as long as you are willing to work around the fundamental
> problems in kernel. You are unable to _fix_ them. They are broken
> BIOSes.
The thing Linux needs to figure out is why Windows doesn't
get confused by what Linux claims to be broken BIOS.
So far I have one live sighting to be addressed by
the upstream kernel (from Knut). I'm certainly looking
forward to the 2nd live sighting...
-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists