[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46B8E2BE.1050408@garzik.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 17:23:10 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Valerie Henson <val@....edu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tulip-users@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>, david@...g.hm,
Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] Semi-pointless NULL test in uli526x driver
Jesper Juhl wrote:
> (resending previously submitted patch from 16/7-2007 22:40)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c::uli526x_interrupt() there's a test
> of the function argument 'void *dev_id' against NULL. But that
> test is pretty pointless, since if ever 'dev_id' is NULL we'll
> already have crashed inside "netdev_priv(dev)".
>
> I don't think dev_id can ever actually be NULL, so the whole block
> inside "if (!dev) {" could probably just go away. But I guess
> there's a good reason someone put that ULI526X_DBUG() in there - and
> if 'dev_id' /can/ actually be NULL then it's nice to have and in
> that case this patch actually fixes a possible crash (hence the
> version number update).
> So I guess that in this case we should just move the
> "db = netdev_priv(dev)" assignment past that NULL test. That's what
> this patch does.
>
> Found by the Coverity checker.
> Compile tested.
>
>
> PS. Please keep me on Cc when replying.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Just remove the dev==NULL test...
Thanks,
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists