[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d6222a80708081731y4e20e0a4oedc27e0766283b6a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 21:31:17 -0300
From: "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <glommer@...il.com>
To: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>
Cc: "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <gcosta@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lguest@...abs.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
anthony@...emonkey.ws, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: Introducing paravirt_ops for x86_64
On 8/8/07, Nakajima, Jun <jun.nakajima@...el.com> wrote:
> > So, unless I'm very wrong, it only makes sense to talk about not
> > supporting large pages in the guest level. But it is not a
> > paravirt_ops problem.
>
> Some MMU-related PV techiniques (including Xen, and direct paging mode
> for Xen/KVM) need to write-protect page tables, avoiding to use 2MB
> pages when mapping page tables. Looks like you did not, and that
> exaplains why the patches are missing the relevant (many) paravirt_ops
> in include/asm-x86_64/pgalloc.h, for example, compared with the i386
> tree.
I see.
I'll address this in the next version of the patch.
--
Glauber de Oliveira Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"
http://glommer.net
"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists