[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1186620295.17752.23.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 10:44:55 +1000
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...e.hu, chrisw@...s-sol.org, jeremy@...p.org,
avi@...ranet.com, anthony@...emonkey.ws,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, lguest@...abs.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 02:24 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Not sure what's best. Ok using a normal export is easiest and not
> that big an issue.
Yeah, there's also been talk of breaking up paravirt_ops into multiple
structs by area, which would lead naturally into finer-grained export
control.
Cheers,
Rusty.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists