[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070809181823.GA32449@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 22:18:23 +0400
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To: Unai Uribarri <unai.uribarri@...enet.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] af_packet: don't enable timestamps in mmap'ed sockets
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:13:54PM +0200, Unai Uribarri (unai.uribarri@...enet.com) wrote:
> On jue, 2007-08-09 at 18:33 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 04:21:54PM +0200, Unai Uribarri (unai.uribarri@...enet.com) wrote:
> > > The attached patch removes the automatic timestamp activation, that
> > > only mmap'ed AF_PACKET sockets perform. I known it can break user
> > > applications, but I believe that it's the correct solution.
> >
> > How tcpdump with mmap libpcap will work with it?
>
> In Linux, you can enable timestamps on any socket executing:
>
> int val = 1;
> setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMP, &val, sizeof(val));
>
> PD: Current release of tcpdump doesn't mmap the reception ring and
> timestamps packets at user space with gettimeofday. It isn't the best
> performing alternative, but it's portable.
IIRC, there was/is a libpcap which worked with mapped sockets, mybe not
official though. Any application which depened on having timestamps with
packets will not work now. Why not to implement an
absolutely_turn_off_timestamps option instead of breaking compatibility?
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists