[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <JMJTMH$F1699B57C9B0E170ED337488612E649B@xandmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:15:53 +0200
From: "Jean-Baptiste Vignaud" <vignaud@...dmail.fr>
To: "jarkao2" <jarkao2@...pl>
Cc: "marcin\.slusarz" <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>,
"mingo" <mingo@...e.hu>, "tglx" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"shemminger" <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-net" <linux-net@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"alan" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch (testing)] Re: 2.6.20->2.6.21 - networking dies after
random time
> So, we still have to wait for the exact explanation...
>
> Thanks very much Marcin!
>
> I think, there is this one possible for your testing yet?:
> Subject: [patch] genirq: temporary fix for level-triggered IRQ resend
> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:00:37 +0200
>
> If it's not a great problem it would be interesting to try this with
> different CONFIG_HZ too e.g. you could start with 100 (I guess, you
> tested very similar thing in 2.6.23-rc2 with 1000(?) already).
>
> Jean-Baptiste: you can skip/break testing of this 'experimental'
ok
I was still testing on -rc2:
Subject: [patch] genirq: temporary fix for level-triggered IRQ resend
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:00:37 +0200
For me after 1day 20hours, the network is still up, with more than 1To
of network traffic. HZ was 1000, i restart with HZ=100.
Jb
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists