[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070810083720.GE1764@ff.dom.local>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:37:21 +0200
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To: Jean-Baptiste Vignaud <vignaud@...dmail.fr>
Cc: "marcin\.slusarz" <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>,
mingo <mingo@...e.hu>, tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>,
torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
shemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-net <linux-net@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch (testing)] Re: 2.6.20->2.6.21 - networking dies after random time
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:15:53AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Vignaud wrote:
...
> I was still testing on -rc2:
> Subject: [patch] genirq: temporary fix for level-triggered IRQ resend
> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:00:37 +0200
>
> For me after 1day 20hours, the network is still up, with more than 1To
> of network traffic. HZ was 1000, i restart with HZ=100.
For me it's enough too but Thomas seems to doubt.
You've written earlier that you've 2.6.23-rc1 with HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
prepared too. So, if this is not a great problem maybe you could try
this first. Tomorrow Thomas may send something, so this 100HZ could
wait yet, I hope?
Many thanks,
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists