lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:25:57 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> To: Michael Chang <thenewme91@...il.com> cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: CFS review Hi, On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Michael Chang wrote: > On 8/10/07, Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> wrote: > > Is there any reason to believe my analysis is wrong? > > Not yet, but if you give Ingo what he wants (as opposed to what you're > giving him) it'll be easier for him to answer what's going wrong, and > perhaps "fix" the problem to boot. > > (The scripts gives info about CPU characteristics, interrupts, > modules, etc. -- you know, all those "unknown" variables.) He already has most of this information and the trace shows _exactly_ what's going on. All this information should be more than enough to allow an initial judgement whether my analysis is correct. Also none of this information is needed to explain the CFS logic a little more, which I'm still waiting for... bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists