[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708101909190.1817@scrub.home>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:19:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CFS review
Hi,
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> I guess I'm going to have to give up on trying to reproduce this... my
> 3GHz P4 is just not getting there from here. Last attempt, compiled UP,
> HZ=1000 dynticks, full preempt and highres timers fwiw.
>
> 6392 root 20 0 1696 332 248 R 25.5 0.0 3:00.14 0 lt
> 6393 root 20 0 1696 332 248 R 24.9 0.0 3:00.15 0 lt
> 6391 root 20 0 1696 488 404 R 24.7 0.0 3:00.20 0 lt
> 6394 root 20 0 2888 1232 1028 R 24.5 0.1 2:58.58 0 sh
Except for UP and HZ=1000, everything else is pretty much turned off.
If you use a very recent kernel, the problem may not be visible like this
anymore.
It may be a bit easier to reproduce, if you change the end time t0 in lt.c
a little. Also try to start the busy loop first.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists