linux-kernel - Re: CFS review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b14e81f00708100954w71e953fcm8a5cca464e4b27df@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:54:41 -0400
From:	"Michael Chang" <thenewme91@...il.com>
To:	"Roman Zippel" <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"Mike Galbraith" <efault@....de>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CFS review

On 8/10/07, Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Is there any reason to believe my analysis is wrong?

Not yet, but if you give Ingo what he wants (as opposed to what you're
giving him) it'll be easier for him to answer what's going wrong, and
perhaps "fix" the problem to boot.

(The scripts gives info about CPU characteristics, interrupts,
modules, etc. -- you know, all those "unknown" variables.)

And perhaps a patch to show what parts you commented out, too, so one
can tell if anything got broken (unintentionally).

-- 
Michael Chang

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. Send me ODT,
RTF, or HTML instead.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Thank you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/