[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <442f95ba19f8622ce04cf0334f34be11@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:07:27 +0200
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
horms@...ge.net.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
csnook@...hat.com, rpjday@...dspring.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
ak@...e.de, cfriesen@...tel.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jesper.juhl@...il.com,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, zlynx@....org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
davem@...emloft.net, wensong@...ux-vs.org, wjiang@...ilience.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on alpha
>> The compiler is within its rights to read a 32-bit quantity 16 bits at
>> at time, even on a 32-bit machine. I would be glad to help pummel any
>> compiler writer that pulls such a dirty trick, but the C standard
>> really
>> does permit this.
>
> Code all over the kernel assumes that 32-bit reads/writes
> are atomic so while such a compiler might be legal it certainly
> can't compile Linux.
That means GCC cannot compile Linux; it already optimises
some accesses to scalars to smaller accesses when it knows
it is allowed to. Not often though, since it hardly ever
helps in the cost model it employs.
Segher
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists