[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46BCC6DF.2040301@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:13:19 -0300
From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, ak@...e.de
CC: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, lguest@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
anthony@...emonkey.ws, Steven@...p2.linux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/25] [PATCH] paravirt hooks for arch initialization
Jeremy Fitzhardinge escreveu:
> Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
>> I think the idea you gave me earlier of using probe_kernel_address could
>> work. Xen/lguest/put_yours_here that won't use an ebda would then have
>> to unmap the page, to make sure a read would fault.
>
> Hm, the memory might be mapped anyway, but we could make sure its all
> zero. discover_ebda should be able to deal with that OK.
>
> J
Indeed, as the EBDA_ADDR_POINTER is not aligned, this may work even better.
It seems to me safe to assume that if we read zero on that line:
ebda_addr = *(unsigned short *)__va(EBDA_ADDR_POINTER);
We could just do ebda_size = 0 and go home happy, skipping the rest of
the process.
Andi, are you okay with it ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists