lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:29:21 -0700 From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com> To: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com> Cc: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Subject: Re: Are we properly prepared to handle 3 Socket setups? > /* > * Maximum threshold is 125 > */ > threshold = min(125, threshold); > > as either the comment or the code is wrong and it seems it's the > code. What's the problem? That line sets threshold to the smaller of the current value or 125, which is exactly what one would want to do if the maximum value is 125. Just do a couple of examples: eg if threshold is 100 going into that line, then the value is left alone; if threshold is 150 then it gets set to 125; and that seems exactly correct. - R. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists