linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <25564.1187035553@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:05:53 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Cc:	Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl

On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:21:10 +0200, Jan Engelhardt said:
> 
> On Aug 14 2007 00:02, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> >
> >Better solution is to have multiple MAINTAINERS files distributed in the
> >kernel tree, IMHO -- say a drivers/net/MAINTAINERS for maintainer info on
> >all various net drivers, drivers/kvm/MAINTAINERS for KVM maintainer info,
> >fs/ext3/MAINTAINERS for ext3 maintainers, fs/MAINTAINERS for generic VFS
> >maintainers info, so on and so forth. Of course, these individual
> >MAINTAINERS files could still have the newly-introduced "F:" fields as
> >well (drivers/net/MAINTAINERS would clearly require it, f.e.) ...
> 
> Yes please.
> 
> Or perhaps even putting the maintainer into the Kconfig files?

There's large swaths of code that don't have an obvious Kconfig entry
but do have a Maintainer entry - VFS, lots of kernel/*, and so on.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped