[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070813201629.GE21719@thunk.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:16:30 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 08:41:03PM +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> writes:
>
> > The maintainer info should be in the source file itself!
>
> Nope, it should be outside of the (downloadable) tarball, because
> once someone get a tarball you can't update the data in it.
> This is fine WRT source (which is static given a version) but
> doesn't work for fast-changing data.
But the maintainers file is in the tarball today. If someone wants to
take the information from the latest git tree, gather it up into a
single html file, and put it on the web, more power to them. But it
seems that the master source of the data should be the source file.
- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists