linux-kernel - Re: [1/2] 2.6.23-rc3: known regressions with patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:29:47 +0200
From:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
	Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>,
	Vitaly Bordug <vitb@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Dan Merillat <dan.merillat@...il.com>,
	Paolo Ornati <ornati@...twebnet.it>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Subject: Re: [1/2] 2.6.23-rc3: known regressions with patches

On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 10:56:53PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 10:24:52PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > On 13/08/07, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> > > > Unclassified
> > > >
> > > > Subject         : reset during bootup - 2.6.23-rc2 (git d23cf676)
> > >
> > > This is already fixed in mainline
> > 
> > commit b8d3f2448b8f4ba24f301e23585547ba1acc1f04
> > 
> > >
> > > There is a real regression with failing builds on some old binutils on
> > > x86-64 know, but I don't know how to fix it.
> > 
> > Did you mean this?
> 
> Yes. Anyways it be likely a WONT-FIX -- aka document newer binutils
> version required. We haven't had any other reports so likely
> that version is not too widely used.

IOW: Either the Linux binutils >= 2.17.50.0.3 or the not yet released 
GNU binutils 2.18 are now required.

Debian 4.0 has older ones, and all distributions released more than a 
year ago for sure also have older ones (the required patch went into 
binutils CVS on 2006-05-30 and 2.17.50.0.3 was released on 2006-07-15).

Isn't that a bit too recent?

> -Andi

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/