| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:42:05 +0200 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, sam@...nborg.org Subject: binutils trouble was Re: [1/2] 2.6.23-rc3: known regressions with patches On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 11:29:47PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Debian 4.0 has older ones, and all distributions released more than a > year ago for sure also have older ones (the required patch went into > binutils CVS on 2006-05-30 and 2.17.50.0.3 was released on 2006-07-15). I have no problem on SUSE 10.0 (2.16.91.0.2-8) or SLES9 (2.15.90.0.1.1-32.10) which are both far older than a year. Both produce good looking vdso.sos. sles8 (2.12.90.0.15; it was really one of the first production binutils for x86-64) doesn't work out of the box (looks like as-instr doesn't work anymore and it has another assembler issue I'll fix) but with that workarounded it also builds a reasonble looking vdso Sam, can you please take a look at the as-instr issue? It seems to succeed now when it should fail. It would be useful if someone could find out which binutils versions really not work. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists