linux-kernel - Re: Documentation - How to debug ACPI Problems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070814183335.67ac0e29@the-village.bc.nu>
Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:33:35 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	trenn@...e.de, "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Documentation - How to debug ACPI Problems

On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:40:01 -0400
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> wrote:

> 
> > +Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, 2007
> > +Copyright (C) 2007 SUSE Linux GmbH
> 
> While it seems to be generally customary to identify the authors of Documentation
> files, it doesn't seem to be customary for them to assert a copyright.
> Is this really necessary?  My concern is that it could discourage contributors
> for user or changing the text in any way they see fit.
> 
> can anybody offer guidance on this?

Its under the GPL so I don't see a problem really. I'd do the same for
Red Hat for new documents of substance I was adding to be honest.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/