[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26059.1187114583@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:03:03 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: trenn@...e.de, "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Documentation - How to debug ACPI Problems
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:40:01 EDT, Len Brown said:
>
> > +Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, 2007
> > +Copyright (C) 2007 SUSE Linux GmbH
>
> While it seems to be generally customary to identify the authors of Documentation
> files, it doesn't seem to be customary for them to assert a copyright.
> Is this really necessary? My concern is that it could discourage contributors
> for user or changing the text in any way they see fit.
>
> can anybody offer guidance on this?
Well, if it's a GPL-friendly license on the document, the contributors should
feel free to change it as needed - that's the point of the GPL.
What it *does* make clear is that the doc was a "work for hire" under
copyright law, and that if there's infringement, it isn't Thomas that's
going to come looking for you, it's Suse Linux GmbH.
> thanks,
> -Len
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists