[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070815164729.GU3672@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:47:29 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, mingo@...e.hu, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
jeremy@...p.org, avi@...ranet.com, anthony@...emonkey.ws,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, lguest@...abs.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, kiran@...lemp.com,
shai@...lemp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/25][V3] irq_flags / halt routines
* Glauber de Oliveira Costa (gcosta@...hat.com) wrote:
> As alternatives what we have now, we can either keep the paravirt_ops as
> it is now for the native case, just hooking the vsmp functions in place
> of the normal one, (there are just three ops anyway), refill the
> paravirt_ops entirely in somewhere like vsmp.c, or similar (or maybe
> even assigning paravirt_ops.fn = vsmp_fn on the fly, but early enough).
This is the best (just override pvops.fn for the few needed for VSMP).
The irq_disabled_flags() is the only problem. For i386 we dropped it
(disabled_flags) as a pvop and forced the backend to provide a flags
(via save_flags) that conforms to IF only.
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists