[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2945.1187196737@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:52:17 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: casey@...aufler-ca.com
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, torvalds@...l.org, viro@....linux.org.uk,
sds@...ho.nsa.gov, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Adding a security parameter to VFS functions
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:
>
> Could you describe how this compares to the proposal that the
> AppArmor developers suggested recently? I expect that we can
> reduce the amount of discussion required, and maybe avoid some
> confusion if you could do that.
I don't know what that is.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists