[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46C49A0D.5080002@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:40:13 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
CC: Sonic Zhang <sonic.adi@...il.com>,
Linux IDE <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH take #5] [libata] libata driver for bf548 on chip ATAPI
controller.
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 8/16/07, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
>> Sonic Zhang wrote:
>>> +static void bfin_set_piomode(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device *adev)
>>> +{
>>> + int mode = adev->pio_mode - XFER_PIO_0;
>>> + unsigned long base = (unsigned long)ap->ioaddr.ctl_addr;
>>
>> (added Bryan Wu to CC)
>>
>> Someone needs to need fix the bfin architecture: the addresses on the
>> bfin_read/bfin_write functions should be 'void __iomem *' not unsigned long.
>
> there are no address pointers anymore, so there is nothing to cast ...
> the bfin_read/bfin_write macros are done in sexy asm:
> #define bfin_write8(addr,val) __asm__ __volatile__("b[%0] = %1;" ::
> "a"(addr), "d"(val))
> or i'm misunderstanding what you mean ...
>
> where do you see (unsigned long) ?
Look up (into the message you quoted).
Regardless of the implementation, the C type system should be employed
to ensure that 'addr' is known to the compiler as 'void __iomem *'
rather than unsigned long.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists